If it was Latourette who said that, he perhaps also should read some of those quotes. I'm wondering whether he is also a Christian who wants to see the world through Christian eyes.

As for Eusebius, what he calls 'errors' are in the eyes of the beholder. Objective, independent third-parties are perhaps a better judge, if they indeed exist.

Such debates continue. In a small way you may consider our discussions to be of the same nature. You would be Eusebius, and I the one in error.