I assume, given your detailed refutation, that you actually read my articles. In which case you would have seen this:

“I have no agenda (there is no wishful thinking on my part), therefore do not want to make the sources say something they do not actually say. However, I am going to make as strong a case as I can that Jesus was in fact married. This does not mean that I necessarily believe it; I am merely analysing the texts and other related material, to see where that can take us”.

Perhaps you don't believe me, but your suggestion that I assumed the conclusion in advance is wildly inaccurate. Nowhere do I say that I offer proof. I invite you to re-read the articles to find a place where I do, if you can. As I said, I was merely examining the relevant texts to see whether there was any evidence to suggest that Jesus was married. The evidence is obviously inconclusive, but the possibility remains.

I'll consider a response to your other points if I receive a meaningful reply to this one.