Do you have any thoughts on Dan Olsen’s response?

“There is an entire history of philosophy and theology which Sender Spike appears to be unaware of based on his comment, which suggests that immanence entails some sort of metaphysical bifurcation. This is, indeed, the exact opposite of the way philosophies of immanence — Spinoza, Deleuze, Delanda, etc. — imagine the real. Immanence maps nicely onto pantheism, from a theist perspective, as you suggest, while also mapping nicely onto atheistic materialism. Sender Spike appears to be mistaking immanence for some sort of panentheism”.