Again you are merely stating an opinion. Who says that intelligent design needs to be something that works outside and independently? It may be completely integrated within the system, and not outside it.

What you're saying is rational reasoning (if you're into that sort of thing), but perhaps bad reasoning. It's not supported by science, merely by the philosophy of physicalism posing as science.

The burden of proof is equally with you, although you resort to an argument that is frequently used.

You have to explain how something as extraordinary and mysterious as life and the universe could have emerged without intelligent design.